“A major hurdle was that “Feminism has strong Western connotations,” said Topal. “It’s the legacy of colonialism. We have to look like Western women to be civilized.” Her feminism, with and without hijab, was always “in the context of religion.” She said, “Feminism pushes muslim women to learn their religion.””
Semiha Topal is so called muslim feminist. What she says above is that it is not Western colonialist civilization that gave Turkish and Arab people their human rights but rather they could be found in those very religious programs that attacked them “if read properly”, and from which Western colonialism saved Turkish and Arab world in 19 century until in the end of 20 century they threw colonialists back and turned rapist again.
| As a Muslim feminist, I know what sharia really means
Malala Yousafzai: ‘I’m a feminist and a Muslim’ “Islam Made Me A Feminist” – The Story Of This Speaker Will Make You Understand What Feminism Is The First American Woman Imam Explains the Rise of Islamic Feminism |
Men are the maintainers of women because allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them” Quran 4:34
And (forbidden to you) are married women, except those whom you have taken as war booty. Qur’an 4:24 “Women are your planting place (for children); come then to your planting place as you please” Qur’an 2:223 ‘Aisha said, “I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women. Look! Her skin is greener than her clothes!” Sahih Bukhari 7:72:715 |
Feminists targeted romantic love of the Western White world that gave humanity endless great poems and masterpieces of world art, just because it formed an unbreakable link between female and male. Yet they have no problem with obligatory sex and marital rape in islam.
| Shulamith Firestone describes romantic love as the pivot of oppression for women—a holocaust, a hell, and a sacrifice.
As Carol Smart declares, feminists have identified love as an aspect of “patriarchy’s ideological armament through which women became hooked into dependent relationships with men, entered into an unfavourable legal contract (namely marriage) and ultimately ended up with care of the children.” This feminist critique of love, sex, and marriage is further developed by Eva Illouz in Why Love Hurts: A Sociological Explanation. In the text, Illouz remains committed to love as a central idea of modernity. she champions its egalitarian optimism and its ability to subvert patriarchy. While acknowledging the power of patriarchy and the division of spheres, Marilyn Friedman considers the central problem of love to stem from its long association with the idea of merger. In Autonomy, Gender, Politics, Friedman argues that the features of merger experienced within romantic love are that the needs and interests of each person become entwined or pooled together; couples feel each other’s highs and lows; there is mutual consideration and awareness; they care for and protect each other; they can communicate with each other efficiently; couples make joint decisions and long-term plans; there is a division of labour; they desire to be seen as good by each other; and they want to be valued by their partners in a way that they value themselves. Additionally, in Revolutions of the Heart: Gender, Power, and the Delusions of Love, Wendy Langford also disputes the ideology of love as positive. Langford claims that while our society has come to “venerate deliverance” through love, with promises of “liberty, equality and togetherness,” romantic love is, in fact, a “process by which restrictions, inequality and dissatisfaction are merely obscured.” She argues that the rhetoric that love takes us higher and allows us to develop is inaccurate. She claims, “Love does not merely fail to give us what we desire, but in so doing, compounds painful feelings of dissatisfaction and low self-esteem.” Its effects, then, are not positive or even neutral; they are largely negative. While love promises happiness and freedom from social constraint, it, in fact, delivers the opposite”. |
Abu Hurayrah said: “The messenger of allah (lice and dung be upon him) said: ‘If a man calls his wife to his bed and she refuses [and does not come], and he spends the night angry with her, the angels will curse her until morning.’” (Reported by al-Bukhari, 4794; the additional phrase quoted in square brackets is from Abu Dawud, al-Sunan, Kitab al-Nikaah, Bab haqq al-zawj ‘ala’l-mar-ah).
Hadith narrated by Muslim: “By the One in Whose Hand is my soul, there is no man who calls his wife to his bed and she refuses, but the One Who is above the heavens [i.e. allah] will be angry with her, until he (her husband) is pleased with her.” Ibn Khuzaymah and Ibn Hibban report a hadith narrated by Jabir: “There are three whose prayers will not be accepted and none of whose good deeds will ascend to heaven: a runaway slave, until he returns to his master; a drunken man until he becomes sober; and a woman with whom her husband is angry, until he is pleased with her.” “Women are your planting place (for children); come then to your planting place as you please” Qur’an 2:223 “Permitted to you, on the night of the Fast, is the approach to your wives; they are raiments for you” (Quran 2:187) |
Wonder why romantic love does not work, Langford?
| “Langford points out the problem is that the success of romantic love depends on a particular abstract individual type and model of rational behaviour that is seldom realistic. This individual is “self-aware and operates on the basis of reason.” Hence, this individual is unrealistic, and is more likely to resemble a man than a woman [this is the opinion on you of real feminism, Ladies!]. What emerges is the notion that love, far from being the liberating and egalitarian, is instead oppressive and degrading to women. This critique is strengthened when we consider it alongside the feminist critiques of sex and of marriage, two institutions that have traditionally been sources of oppression for women.”
In other words, women are MERE STUPID according feminism, that’s why romantic love with them does not work. As simple as that. |
The Prophet said, “Isn’t the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?” The women said, “Yes.” He said, “THIS IS BECAUSE OF THE DEFICIENCY OF A WOMAN’S MIND.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 48, Number 826)
According to Yunus – Ibn Wahb – Ibn Zayd “Whereupon God said: Now it is My obligation to make her bleed once every month, as she made this tree bleed. I ALSO MAKE HER STUPID, although I had created her intelligent (halimah), and must make her suffer pregnancy and birth with difficulty, although I made it easy for her to be pregnant and give birth. Ibn Zayd said: Were it not for the affliction that affected Eve, the women of this world would not menstruate, AND THEY WOULD BE INTELLIGENT and, when pregnant, give birth easily.” (The History of Al-Tabari: General Introduction and From the Creation to the Flood, translated by Franz Rosenthal [State University of New York Press (SUNY), Albany 1989], Volume 1, pp. 280-281) |
Muslim feminism is a kind of large taqiyya that seeks to introduce islam to Western people.
Now when women are raped as punishment for dressing as humans all over Pakistan and related countries, and moreso it came to Europe and now is going on in the streets of Europe, we might think that feminists rethought their views on colonialism and muslim feminism, yet not, look here:
“This chapter is concerned with the question whether the testimonial performances of the #MeToo movement were a liberating feminist revolution or only a social media hype for white, cisgender and privileged women. It argues that while feminists have been organizing against violence for centuries, these actions have had their limitations with regard to disadvantaged women and under-represented communities. The chapter also explores the mainstream cultural and political impact of #MeToo that has refocused attention away from violence towards all women, and therefore, at least partially, functioned as a backlash against feminism and women’s rights.”
It Happened to #MeToo: Queer Feminist Critique of Cisgender White Feminism
Tiina Rosenberg, founding member and board member of the Feminist Initiative political party, is discontent that White women are trying to use her jewish/muslim feminism to protect themselves from rape. Apparently it is a form of White supremacy and colonialism to protect yourself from rape if you are White. Which any true feminist would of course furiously fight. Apparently you have to sometimes be raped to be part of feminism and to protect women’s rights.
They are not content that their White flock is trying to reverse their own instruments of propaganda against themselves. Yet they would be fully content if Finland took one more million muslim rapists:
Let’s analyze more the essence of feminism:
“It is sensational how blind and naive Norwegian can be towards non-Western men. Norwegian women must use common sense,”
“The numbers [of rape] do not surprise me at all. Many immigrants find that Norwegian women send them signals that they want sexual contact. And then it can soon go wrong. Many Norwegian women have far too little knowledge of non-Western men’s view of women”
“Norwegian women must take responsibility for the fact that Muslim men find their manner of dress provocative. And since these men believe women are responsible for rape, the women must adapt to the multicultural society around them.”
“It is never acceptable with rape. But it is understandable that some men from non-Western countries think that they get sexual invitations from Norwegian women who on their side are just acting normal for a Norwegian woman. It is sensational how blind and naive Norwegian women can be towards non-Western men,”
“I will not blame Norwegian women for the rapes. But Norwegian women must understand that we live in a multi-cultural society and adapt themselves to it.”
“In most places people think that it is the woman who holds the blame for the rape. And it is reasonable that immigrants take with them such attitudes when they flee here to the country,”
Unni Wikan, the author of the above, was awarded the 2004 Fritt Ord Award “for her insightful, outspoken and challenging contribution to the debate on value conflicts in the multi-cultural society.”
“You have to create an adaptive educational system and adapt all the self-understanding of the states. They are not anymore only White or only Swedish or only Portuguese or only German. They are multicultural places in the world”
– Anette Kahane, leftist, jewess.
You see absolutely same rhetoric in this muslims’ discussion on the adaptation:
– …that Sweden isn’t their country. [Democrats hate to tell it but] Swedes need to adapt now.
– Does Sweden have about 2 million immigrants?
– I am not sure exactly, but it is large number. It is what is it. Country’e population. One fifth. It’s a lot. For it to work people change. Yes, swedes have more immigrants about them and adapt to that. Because adaptation should happen.
“Swedes must accept Sweden is no longer a country of their own. Muslims now make up 20% of the population and growing.
We don’t have to change for them, they have to adapt to us.”
– muslims in video.
“Norwegian women should adapt to multicultural society” – Unni Wikan.
“Europe has not yet learned to be multicultural” – Barbara Spectre.
We should not adapt to White men when they wish to use toilet as they want but we should adapt to sharia law.
– We demand halal food at all times.
– Don’t they provide you with halal food?
– Yes they do but it is not really acceptable for us. It would be much better if we cooked our own food or had a muslim chief.
– Don’t you think that since you are hear you have to adapt.
– Its a good question. We learn language and everything we can. But religion can’t be adapted. You have to deal with that.
Stop, their religion prescribes murder, rape and loot of non-muslims that we all are. Is this what we are to deal with in his opinion? Apparently it is.
Unni Wikan tries to downplay her quotes as being misinterpreted to protect rape, but the essence of them is not even the question of rape, but the way how suddenly multiculturalism which is nothing but capital treason is out of all sudden placed equal or even beyond national interests or interests of human rights.
| Multicultural agenda constitutes worst threats to health and life of the native citizens and completely goes against their human rights, namely rights to life, health and inviolability, thus violates national safety and Bill of Rights. Yet Unni Wikan treats multiculturalism as having some equality rights with all the above to the extent when it comes to rape she does not see the problem in multicultural agenda itself, rather she prefers to see it somewhere else, for example Norwegian women somehow became obligated to know rapist codes or however it is called and align with them. In other words Wikan and not only Wikan places rapist codes of sharia or whichever in some kind of equality with Bill of Rights and national laws which is a crime in itself.
There are Supreme Laws and Supreme Court that rule this planet and that were organized once by ruling forces in this planet in the whiter and brighter times and they prescribe Bill of Rights and national laws have to adapt to it. What these feminists and leftists are doing is essentially what Russian top rabbi Dugin, main ideologist of Putin’s government, is trying to do: overthrow the main values of this planet that happen to be formally Western, and place whatever third world savage country’s rules in equal or even higher position than them. In other words, feminists Wikan, Spectre and the like side by side with Dugin are fighting together that our rights to freedom, life, health, sexual and physical inviolability were not anymore the major let alone the only rules. They fight that sharia and its like had equal position with these or even outplay these. For example. If we look how women spend their time in rapist countries, they are not busy building rockets and serving country by genial innovation and great work. Simply because they have no time for it. They have to forever concentrate on learning and memorizing endless rapist codes what they should or should not do to not get raped. This is probably the way Unni Wikan is going to solve the problem in her country as well. Probably it will not give her country great rockets and cosmic ships, instead it will have wonderful combination of multiculturalism and human rights, where women would be busy memorizing and performing endless ritualistic rules how to not get raped. Probably it will include being caged in the kitchen for lifetime and inability to get education and work, so the rockets once again would have to be left for China. Maybe this is Dugin’s ending goal in the long run as well. |
“In Holland, myriad women now bear the horrible scar that has infamously become known as “smiley,” whereby one side of the face is cut up from mouth to ear – a war mark left by Muslim rapists as a warning to other women who don’t veil themselves.
In France, the phenomenon of Muslim gang rape as punishment for non-veiling even has a word to describe it: “tournante” (take your turn). In areas where Muslims form the majority (i.e. the Muslim suburb of Courneuve, France), even non-Muslim women feel pressured to veil themselves in fear of Muslim sexual and physical punishment.” “Gang-rape phenomenon known as ‘taharrush gamea’ in the Arab world is now seen in muslim attacks on European women. The name of the practice translates to ‘collective harassment’ and is carried out by large groups of men who sexually assault lone women. The men first surround their victim in circles. Some then sexually assault her, while others not directly involved watch or divert outsiders’ attention to what is occurring.” White Gold: The Extraordinary Story of Thomas Pellow and Islam’s One Million White Slaves |
Now, I see the key to how Unni Wikan manages to do it is not in the above but in the below:
“Unfortunately women are more vulnerable to rape than men”. [and apparently this is why they should learn rapist code]
Let me please correct you, Wikan, women are more vulnerable to everything not only rape, ONLY if they are not protected by men 24/7 as they used to be before your feminism. Being protected by a manpower you logically can’t be more vulnerable than a manpower. Before wiping national borders multiculturalism wiped inside societal borders such as male-female relationships, because without it society would have been monolithic and impenetrable. Sexes are not designed to “not depend” on each other or to survive separately, because they are social phenomena and are a way to bond not to separate. They are designed to work together – in families, in streets, in job collectives, everywhere. So if your goal really was to make women less vulnerable you would have not be feminist in the first place.
Destroying country demands destroying male-female union and natural spiritual roles first.
Gentile Heroes fighting for our Heritage against Islamic Jew
Sources:
https://wikiislam.github.io/wiki/Top_10_Controversial_Verses_Concerning_Women.html
https://islamqa.info/en/answers/2006
Can a Wife Say No to Her Husband in Islam?
by Omar Abdullah
Answering Islam – Did Muhammad Teach that Women are Stupid and Inferior to Men?
Romantic Love – a Feminist Conundrum?
Religion of Rape
Muslim Rape, Feminist Silence
Norway: Professor Unni Wikan on rape
Jewish and Muslim Feminists
It Happened to #Metoo: Queer Feminist Critique of Cisgender White Feminism