Xian bible and quran are shock full of propaganda of modern European immigration politics.
Kikes themselves were eternal immigrants and rapefugees everywhere they came: they robbed and plagued Egypt, then totally destroyed it via so called “10 penalties”, took all they could took and went away with it all. Whatever other country in the region they trespassed they robbed it empty. They were commanded by their g-d to genocide everyone except most little girls of the kindergarten age to sleep with, in some cases even them and all cattle and live beings of the area, but to take everything that is material and non-life to themselves.
Jew mohameth and its terrorist brethren were rapefugees in every area they came, they never worked or did anything useful for the area, instead they engaged into every criminal activity, parasitized, proselytized their terrorist faith killed those whom they could not brainwash.
Jewsus Christ was the most professional economical sexual and emotional parasite in whole jewish literature: it entered houses, demanded food and drinks [Luke 10:38-42], children for sex [Secret Gospel of Mark], all it needed, and then went to another house to do the same. Thus it hung around and took whatever it wanted everywhere whenever just because “it was gawd” [Luke 19:29-35].
Now here are some quotes about multiculturalism and welcoming migration in bible and quran:
For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me (Matthew 25:35).
Therefore welcome one another as Christ has welcomed you, for the glory of God (Romans 15:7).
But no stranger had to spend the night in the street, for my door was always open to the traveller (Job 31:32).
Let strangers feast on your wealth and your toil enrich the house of another (Proverbs 5:10).
When a stranger sojourns with you in your land, you shall not do him wrong. You shall treat the stranger who sojourns with you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God (Leviticus 19: 33-34).
“There is no longer Jew or Greek; there is no longer slave or free; there is no longer male and female, for all of you are one in Christ Jesus.” [Galatians 3:28]
I have to note here, new testament is full of endless demands that “you must be ready for my next coming” “wait for me as a bride does”, “do not sleep because I can come any moment”, and the like. It was served under the idea that immigrant or “guest” is a gawd in disguise, and who knows what “guest” might turn out to be gawd. Gawd is walking around in disguise, so whomever it is – a robber, a villain, a rapist invader – everyone might turn out to be “lord thy gawd” so you have to “never sleep and always be ready” which means always welcome everyone whomever it is because it might turn out to be thy gawd.
This egg shells stepping idea is reinstalled by the modern head of xian church very blatantly:
“Pope Francis, in his message for the 2024 World Day of Migrants and Refugees, highlights the biblical passage that “our citizenship is in heaven” and states that “the encounter with the migrant … ‘is also an encounter with Christ.’””
In quran and islamic literature we have wonderful picture that perfectly corresponds to modern politics of tolerance to any muslim from any country, complete wipe of any and all borders between nations or any otehr differences except religious ones, destroying cast system and establishing equality.
Here are some quotes:
“Whosoever fights under the banner of the blind, becoming angry for partisanship (‘asabiyah i.e tribal-ship), calling towards it, or supporting it and then dies, he dies a death of (one in) the Days of Ignorance (Jahiliyah).” [ Sahih Muslim(6/21)]
“A believer (in regards to) to another believer is like a solid building, one part supports the other.” – and then he interlaced his fingers to demonstrate this. [Al-Bukhari (no.481) and Muslim (no.2585)
Ibn Taymiyah (RH) said: “Everything that is foreign to the call of Islam and the Qur’an, with regards to lineage, land, nationality, schools of thoughts and methodologies, then that is from the calls of the Days of Ignorance (jahiliyah). Once the Muhajireen and the Ansar argued, such that one of the Muhajireen said: ‘O Muhajireen!’ (meaning, come to assist me) And one of the Ansar said: ‘O Ansar!’ Upon hearing this, the Prophet (salla Allahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said: ‘Is it with the calls of Jahiliyah that you cry out, while l am still amongst you?!’ [Reported by Al-Bukhaaree (8/137)] And he became very angry at that.”[Majmoo’-ul-Fatawa (3/456)]
*Jahiliyyah – is a term for the pre-islamic era. Here jew mohameth means that its non-islamic relative or fellow countryman / compatriot is of no interest to it any longer.
Equality under gawd:
“lndeed, Allah has revealed to me that you should have humbleness. And that no one should act proudly and oppressively over anyone else, nor should one boast over anyone else.” – Saheeh Muslim (8/120)
Patriotism and Nationalism are Pagan and come from Pagan pre-islamic culture:
“It is reported in the Sunan of Abu Dawud from the Prophet (SAWS) that he said: He is not of us, the one who calls to partisanship; he is not of us, the one who fights for partisanship; and he is not of us, the one who dies on partisanship.
Shaykhul-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (RA) said: “Everything different from the tradition of Islam and Qur’an, whether it is related to progeny, country, nationality, doctrine, or school of thought, is from the customs of the pre-Islamic [read: jahiliyyah] period.”
So shall we now wonder why both Catholic Church and whatever abrahamist sects in Europe fully support and fund muslim migration, forever make speeches to “welcome strangers among us” – here some of them:
Strangers No Longer: Together on the Journey of Hope
Issued by USCCB, January 22, 2003
Welcoming the Stranger Among Us: Unity in Diversity
Issued by NCCB/USCC, November 15, 2000
Some things I wish to quote. They mostly reveal the historical depths of this Catholic xian war against nationalism and patriotism among gentiles, so they also saw it as not only one but most problematic one of all Pagan traditions they tried to shed.
“Though we celebrate the diversity within our communities, we bishops must also confess that today, as in the past, the treatment of the immigrant too often reflects failures of understanding and sinful patterns of chauvinism, prejudice, and discrimination that deny the unity of the human family, of which the one baptism is our enduring sign. Such patterns, in the words of Pope John Paul II, “show the urgent need for a transformation of structures and a change of mentality, which is what the Great Jubilee of the Year 2000 asks of Christians and every person of good will” (Message for World Migration Day 2000, no. 1).”
There is such chapter there as “Forgetful of our Heritage” that shows how Catholic Church’s attempts to wreck White society with non-White immigration to America (this open letter is specifically targeted at Americans) goes back to 19th century and further.
“Forgetful of Our Heritage
Perhaps the greatest obstacle to welcoming the stranger is that many Americans have forgotten their immigrant past. “Nativism” assumes that there is just one image of a “real American” and that immigrants either cannot live up to it or willfully refuse to do so. Originally directed against Catholics of all sorts, today such nativism can be seen in a campaign against “multiculturalism” in all its forms, on the premise that reverence for distinctive traditions and histories undermines the unity of American society. Like the Catholic “Americanizers” of the nineteenth century, who opposed the establishment of national parishes, the critics of multiculturalism today want immigrants and other distinctive groups to shed their languages, customs, and identities as quickly as possible, to become Americans “just like the rest of us.” But “the rest of us” are, in fact, a culturally plural society—Catholics, Protestants, Jews, and Muslims; believers and non-believers; Southerners and Northerners; Irish, Italian, and Mexican — proud of our heritages and proud to be Americans, all at once.”
This 2000 idea is literally identical to the later ideas of individuals from presumably non-religious and non-xian background:
“There is no such thing as a native Swedish culture.”
“The idea that there is a unified native culture dating back to ancient times is not based on facts. We have always been influenced by outside forces.”
– Ingrid Marianne Lomfors, jewess.
Further looking into Catholic Church narrative we see double standard of one-sided “cultural enrichment” and diversity. When it comes to migrants their cultural identity is highly protected, we, host nations, are put in the pace of “bad borgs who want to assimilate the innocents” – as if we asked to be invaded at all.
“Indeed, the pope warns repeatedly against attempting to rush a process of assimilation or cultural adaptation in the name of unity, because the goal is the mutual enrichment of peoples, not their assimilation to one way of being human. Thus the pope reached out to refugees in the camp at Phanat Nikon, Thailand, in November 1984, saying, “My heart is with you. Have faith in yourselves. Don’t forget your identity as a free people with your own legitimate place in this world. Don’t lose your distinctive personality as a people! Remain firmly rooted in your respective cultures. The world needs to learn more from you and to join in appreciation of your uniqueness.”
The pope teaches that immigrants must guard their cultures for the enrichment of the world. But the cultures of immigrants will only be able to enrich this country when all Americans—recent immigrants and those long settled in this country—open their hearts and minds to their neighbors and come to appreciate the diverse cultures that make up this society. Knowledge of cultures cannot just come from books, but must come from the concrete efforts of individuals to get to know their neighbors, in all their diversity.”
While our own nationalism, cultural richness and uniqueness is seen as “frightening”, “nuclear war” and “hate”:
“Pope Pius XI:
The Church founded by the Redeemer is one, the same for all races and all nations. Beneath her dome, as beneath the vault of heaven, there is but one country for all nations and tongues; there is room for the development of every quality, advantage, task and vocation which God the Creator and Savior has allotted to individuals as well as to ethnical communities. … Whoever tampers with that unity and that indivisibility wrenches from the Spouse of Christ one of the diadems with which God Himself crowned her; he subjects a divine structure, which stands on eternal foundations, to criticism and transformation by architects whom the Father of Heaven never authorized to interfere”
— encyclical letter Mit Brennender Sorge, 18; see also 10, 11.
“Pope St. Paul VI condemned the nationalism that led to isolation and opposed human development, but acknowledged the value of pride in national history and culture (Populorum Progressio, 62).”
“Where there is love, there is no room for prejudice, for ‘security’ zones separating us from our neighbors, for the exclusionary mindset that, tragically, we now see emerging also in political nationalisms,”
– Pope Leo XIV at the meeting with Vice President JD Vance
From the interview with the pope Francis:
“The pope also talked about the dangers of surging nationalism and isolationist sentiments, saying, “I am worried because you hear speeches that resemble those by Hitler in 1934. ‘Us first, We … We ….’ ”
Such thinking, he said, “is frightening.”
Asked about the dangers of “sovereignism” or nationalism, the pope said it represented an attitude of “isolation” and closure.
“A country must be sovereign, but not closed” inside itself, he said.
National sovereignty, he said, “must be defended, but relations with other countries, with the European community, must also be protected and promoted.”
“Sovereignism is something that goes “too far” and “always ends badly — it leads to war.”
In other words, xian church sees our desire to stay monolithic states we always sought to be as “a threat of war”.
Here the words nationalism, antisemitism and nuclear war are put basically as synonyms.
Nationalism is also used by xian church as a synonymous to hate:
POPE CONDEMNS Nationalism – “Walls of HATE Must Fall!”
Wonder where it originates from and what it resemles:
“Gentile nationalism and close family relationships are an indication of psychiatric disorder. At a deep level the work of the Frankfurt School is addressed to altering Western societies in an attempt to make them resistant to anti-Semitism by pathologizing gentile group affiliations….The opposition of Jewish intellectuals to cohesive gentile groups and a homogeneous gentile culture has perhaps not been sufficiently emphasized.”
“Frankfurt School may be described as a form of radical individualism that nevertheless despised capitalism-an individualism in which all forms of gentile collectivism are condemned as an indication of societal or individual pathology. Thus in Horkhiemer’s essay on German Jews the true enemy of the Jews is gentile collectivity’s of any kind, and especially nationalism.”
The Culture Of Critique, by Kevin Mac Donald
As for our national borders church respects them only until these migrants need something that is ours – aliens’ needs always come first:
four star hotel is not good enough.
Ungrateful migrants refuse accommodation in rural Ireland
and demand to be taken back to the city.
UNGRATEFUL Illegal African migrants
demand SPECIAL TREATMENT in New York
“Some Christian thinkers have adopted these terms as a helpful way to understand Christian ethical debates over how to prioritize caring for people who are more closely connected or less connected to us. Those who take a cosmopolitan stance argue that Christians should care equally about all people of the world and should not show preference to family members or those within their near orbit, even if, for practical reasons, they do assist those close to them more often.”
“Early theologians, including Clement of Rome, the first-century bishop of Rome, and John Chrysostom, archbishop of Constantinople in the fourth and fifth centuries, demonstrated cosmopolitan tendencies.”
“The Church recognizes the right of sovereign nations to control their territories but rejects such control when it is exerted merely for the purpose of acquiring additional wealth. More powerful economic nations, which have the ability to protect and feed their residents, have a stronger obligation to accommodate migration flows.”
“While the sovereign state may impose reasonable limits on immigration, the common good is not served when the basic human rights of the individual are violated. In the current condition of the world, in which global poverty and persecution are rampant, the presumption is that persons must migrate in order to support and protect themselves and that nations who are able to receive them should do so whenever possible. It is through this lens that we assess the current migration reality between the United States and Mexico.”
“While recognizing the right of the sovereign state to control its borders, Exsul Familia also establishes that this right is not absolute, stating that the needs of immigrants must be measured against the needs of the receiving countries:
Since land everywhere offers the possibility of supporting a large number of people, the sovereignty of the State, although it must be respected, cannot be exaggerated to the point that access to this land is, for inadequate or unjustified reasons, denied to needy and decent people from other nations, provided of course, that the public wealth, considered very carefully, does not forbid this”.
What about christian nationalists who associate xianity with their national identity just because it plagued their nation for too long and they forgot where it originated:
“Some priests think that they can get the people to board the nationalist wagon and then drive them into the Church that way. But in most cases, the wagon falls apart and does not bring the people into the Church. It is better to get into the Catholic wagon in the first place and drive straight to Church” (Bl. George, entry of Feb. 19, 1919).
Sources:
https://www.christiantoday.com/news/welcoming-the-stranger-in-our-midst-10-bible-verses
https://islam.stackexchange.com/questions/1035/what-is-the-view-of-islam-on-nationalism-and-patriotism
Strangers No Longer: Together on the Journey of Hope
Welcoming the Stranger Among Us: Unity in Diversity
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ingrid_Lomfors#cite_note-nyheteridag-20151013-15
https://www.usccb.org/committees/migration/immigration
https://www.thedivinemercy.org/articles/popes-and-saints-against-nationalism
https://americanfaith.com/pope-leo-xiv-nationalism-peace/
https://www.ncronline.org/vatican/new-interview-pope-explains-aim-synod-warns-against-nationalism
https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2019-05/pope-francis-pontifical-academy-social-sciences-nationalism.html
https://www.ncregister.com/commentaries/is-nationalism-consistent-with-the-catholic-faith
https://republicannation.com/pope-condemns-nationalism-walls-of-hate-must-fall/
https://www.deathofcommunism.com/cultural-judaism/
https://theconversation.com/whether-christians-should-prioritize-care-for-migrants-as-much-as-for-fellow-citizens-has-been-debated-for-centuries-248640
quran
bible
Secret Gospel of Mark