Alexander Dugin is professor of Lomonosov Moscow University, political faculty. Wonder what he teaches the new generation of Russian politicians who are all children of high ranking jewish oligarchs and their governmental puppets. Who will rule Russia next several decades and what politics they are going to apply both inside and outside Russia. The ideology and brains behind Russia should interest since She is major atomic superpower actively participating in wars and outer political affairs.
So what do we have here? What about European migrant crisis and the most important event going on in the globe – White genocide? What is being taught to Russian students about it?
“Then I was in Italy and France. And I saw two Europes at the same time: Europe 1 and Europe 2. Europe, believing in the inevitability of its triumphant path in history, where all problems are seen as merely technical, and we are invited to follow suit. And the other Europe — the real Italy and France, reading, thinking, intellectual, politically engaged.
Representatives of the right and left, of undefined circles, representatives of spiritual movements who are searching for identity — this is the Europe that views the current status quo and the dominance of liberal discourse as a catastrophe, as a betrayal of European tradition. It sees the collapse of the family, the collapse of traditional social institutions, the ideology of tolerance and multiculturalism as absolutely unacceptable, destructive and catastrophic processes that are destroying the core of Europe, turning Europe into a transit point for representatives of the most diverse societies, who are not even offered the chance to become Europeans.
They are left as they are. Gradually, they lose their cultural identity and do not accept the European one. The result is a kind of chaotic conglomerate, ruled by a liberal totalitarian elite separated from the people, which reaps huge dividends from the exploitation of this completely unnatural, sick system that has lost its own place in history.
And in search of an alternative, the second Europe turns to islam. I have seen dozens of pure-blooded Italians from wonderful families, from the best aristocratic families, and many French people from high society who have converted to islam out of hatred for this Europe 1, out of hatred for human rights, for this ideology that puts an end to the high spiritual, cultural and religious values that Europe has lived by throughout its history.”
So is it good or bad to hate your own cultural heritage and turn to islam?
“…It is necessary to uproot and expel from our society all these secular, enlightened, liberal-democratic, human rights elements that are leading us down the path of Europe. They are deeply anti-Orthodox, anti-Christian, and anti-national.”
“This is what moslems refer to as the ‘great jihad,’ which is waged against one’s own sins and vices. But there is also the “lesser jihad” — the struggle against the political embodiment of evil. And for us, orthodox Russian people, this political embodiment of evil is liberalism, the West, America and American hegemony.”
“The fight against the hijab is not a fight for French identity, but against a culture that is trying to preserve centuries-old traditional forms, the philosopher believes.
‘The Islamic hijab is opposed not by some French headscarf, not by a traditional long dress that would reflect identity, but by the absence of a dress, the absence of a headscarf. That is, these are nihilistic attacks by representatives of a culture without any religion or sacredness on a culture that has preserved this sacredness,’ he noted.
The thinker expressed confidence that hijabs are a unifying factor between muslims and christians, and that the ban on hijabs is directed equally against islam and christianity.
He noted that muslim women and traditional orthodox ones are very similar in their dress code. This is even reflected in how they ‘pin up their headscarves.’
‘This is the deepest unity of ancient foundations that do not divide but unite muslims and christians. Headscarves (hijabs) should unite, but the ban on wearing hijabs is not only anti-islamic, it is a deeply anti-christian issue.’
Dugin called those who fight against traditional values the kingdom of the Antichrist. ‘They are not only targeting islamic hijabs, they are also attacking the crucifix, the church, and communion. For us, this is the kingdom of the Antichrist, and for muslims, it is the kingdom of Dajjal.’
Among more or less obvious things Dugin says one less so obvious thing that interested me as it contains hidden message: long dress and headscarf (hijab) is a thing that somehow “reflects identity” while some other dressing does not. And I decided to examine more closely kike identity studies to understand what is identity in general according kikes.
- I don’t understand people who try to tear down [some video]
Spectre:
– they are xenophobic racists scared of competing in a multicultural society, when they become a minority the world will be free.
What is White Race? Define it for me? It is 18th century social construct of privileged aristocrats.
Being jewish is tangible unbroken form of identity going back 3000 years. Whiteness is a construct of 200 ybp [years?].
Israel is tiny nation with only 8 million people. We can’t take too many immigrants because we depend on aid as it is.”
Why jewishness or blackness is an identity while Whiteness is not?
“Blackness is an identity that can be plausibly argued. Black studies are the studies of the people who has formed itself as a resistance to its oppression. The task is to bring this minority together in such a way that it makes this impossible for the legacy of Whiteness to reproduce itself”.
– Noel Ignatiev
Here is the key to what identity in the mind of kike can or cannot be.
The only legal identity of a Gentile for the jew is the one that can be temporarily plausibly argued by the current situation. It is needed for some current jewish plans. In the above example the plan is to do away with Whiteness. For this goal they need Black identity. After they do away with their enemy #1 Black identity will not be needed anymore and thus not anymore plausibly argued.
In other words, Gentile should not have an identity at all, because any identity is a form of an oppression. Yet there is one type of identity that may exist for some time: the one that is formed by kike propaganda as a reaction to the alleged oppression of some kind. The identity of a sufferer and of a victim of something. If you identify in any way except that of a victim – of a specific type of oppression jews told that you suffered from – your form of identity is oppressive in some way and undesired.
Through all my investigation on kike identity studies, mostly Noel Ignatiev, it reads that race as a large genetic group is not an identity but rather some sort of oppression while all so to say non-oppressive racial identities emerged only as a resistance to this temporary oppression thus should vanish after their mission is complete. Which leads to the idea that no genetic identity should exist in the long run.
This is a very notorious undercurrent message in all kike teachings. Actual original Marx’s communism has the same idea: the only non-oppressive class that is proletarian one exists only as a weapon against other less desired classes, so after they are destroyed no last one is anymore needed and there is apparently a non-class ideal society to emerge.
Yet in Dugin we read that there is some identity that should exist:
‘The Islamic hijab is opposed not by some French headscarf, not by a traditional long dress that would reflect identity, but by the absence of a dress, the absence of a headscarf.‘
I have to explain one important thing so you understand the whole story. There is a reason behind his using the word “headscarf” not “hijab” while he tries to use it in the same meaning as hijab while it has not. And this is yeshiva tactic.
The above quote about the French is a translation from originally Russian news that were aimed at Russians and Russian TV. The truth is Russians really wear headscarf as a national headdress. Yet they use it not only as headdress but also as a neck-scarf for warming or beauty purposes. But even when it is used to warm the head it never fully covers the hair. It simply can’t as it is not designed to.
This is how Russian headscarf is worn:
Long dress that covers body and the very specific headdress that covers the hair represent religion not race, not national culture. They represent a group of religions that consider woman’s body and hair evil and demand that they were covered. Namely abrahamic religions and the jews as their creators. And jews are both race and nation as we know. So yes, these things does represent one very unic genetic identity – the jewish one.
Dugin Admits He Studies the Kabbalah in Hebrew:
When he says that kabbalah which is a greatest achievement of the human spirit apparently placed the wisdom into the heads of the people, he is answered that kabbalah has nothing to do with the wisdom of the [ordinary, let alone non-jewish] people. The key here is that kabbalah is for the chosen people and for the chosen individuals among them. It is the most strict the most totalitarian structure in the world.
This is the essence of yeshiva school teachings: use the word so that no one understands or understands in a way you want them to understand.
Jewish kabbalah is introduced into yeshiva schools and is about presenting to Gentiles jewish teachings in a way Gentiles might accept them. So no wonder why and what Dugin learns kabbalah for. His “nationalism” which he calls “national bolshevism” btw is apparently based in xian, muslim and judaic religions that are jewish national in their origins and not Gentile national at all. This is not the first time they use words “nation” and “people” as such. I think he calls his ideas “national bolshevism” for a reason. Bolshevism uses the word “people” all the time: rulers and power structures of USSR were called “the servants of the people”, all wealth and all lands of the country officially “belonged to people”, the politic and intelligent elite was called “the leader of the people”, “the writer of the people” etc. But the only people that stands behind bolshevism is the jewish people, thus when they say “all wealth belongs to the people” they mean by that that “g-d gave jews the wealth and the blood of all nations” and bolshevism realizes it by abolishing private property in Gentile nation.
Wait, it is not first time we hear that [some Gentile nation] has “no culture” or “no traditions” while muslims do. We heard it somewhere else:
“There is no such thing as indigenous Swedish culture”
— Jewess Ingrid Lonfors, official working for Swedish government.
“I think that’s what makes many Swedes jealous of immigrant groups. You have a culture, an identity, a history, something that brings you together. And what do we have? We have Midsummer’s Eve and such silly things.”
— Jewess Mona Sahlin in a speech to the Turkish youth organization Euroturk, March, 2002
This ideas are also very popular among the officials of the xian church:
“The Orthodox Church preserves in its history and tradition the remarkable names of Saints Cyril and Methodius, Equal to the Apostles. In a sense, we are the Church of Cyril and Methodius. They came from the enlightened Greco-Roman world and went to preach to the Slavs. And who were the Slavs? They were barbarians, people who spoke an incomprehensible language, second-class citizens, almost animals. And then these enlightened men came to them, brought them the light of christ’s truth, and did something very important: they began to speak to these barbarians in their own language, they created the Slavic alphabet and Slavic grammar, and translated the word of god into this language. This tradition is so deeply ingrained in our church that for us all peoples are equal, there are no barbarians among them. Because for some, we too were once barbarians, although in reality we were never barbarians. So, all peoples are equal and everyone should be addressed, preferably using their culture and their language.”
Russian patriarch Kirill of Moscow (Orthodox analogue of catholic pope). Source
The above, I mean the last part where he says that since we the White Race ourselves “were apparently barbarians” according rewritten xian history, there should not be barbarians at all then, and all should be considered somewhat equal, bears the same message as this one:
“Immigration is nothing new”
“We are all a consequence of immigration”
“There is no such thing as indigenous Swedish culture”
Ingrid Lomfors, October 12, 2015
So, left sector, Dugin and his Eurasism, xian chirch and kike identity studies call any White national culture barbarian and non-existent, while promoting islam, judaism and xianity as something civilized and cultural, also stating that since we ourselves “were once barbarians” [i.e. since they rewrote our history] we now owe everything to every actual barbarian.
By “no barbarians” they obviously hint on current migration politics and their message is for us to accept it at all costs. Yet when it comes to real war danger of any racial White country Dugin suddenly blows up and starts expressing uncontrolled hate and genocide speech at occasion, calling White nations every possible foul word he can find.
About Zimbabwe conflict in Africa:
“I am for black people. White civilization — its cultural values, the lying, inhuman model of the world built by it—has not justified itself. Everything is heading towards the beginning of white pogroms on a planetary scale. Russia is saved only because we are not pure white. Robber transnational corporations, the oppression and suppression of everyone else, MTV, blue and pink—these are the fruits of a white civilization that must be eliminated. Therefore, I am for red, yellow, green, black—just not for white. I wholeheartedly stand on the side of the people of Zimbabwe. ”
— Dugin’s interview for Kommersant
About White genocide in Ukraine:
“Today’s Ukrainians are a race of degenerates that crawled up from the sewage. Genocide is in order.”
— Dugin’s quote from an interview with Tucker Carlson in English.
‘Ukrainians are collective transgenders. Russians who have changed their gender and ethnicity for an abstract, fictitious, absurd alternative. A transgender man does not become a woman. He becomes a freak. So does a Russian who imagines himself to be Ukrainian.’
‘And then, overnight, they will become what they always were. Pathetic, unintelligent, disloyal, loveless losers. Nationalists without a nation. Extremists without an ideology. Dogs attacking someone else’s statehood without having their own. Without a hint of style, culture or rationality.’
– Dugin for RIA Novosti.
So in kike studies Gentile Identity exists in two cases:
1. When it needs to be genocided
2. When it is needed to genocide someone else
For Dugin in this perspective of kike identity studies the so called major non-oppressive (temporary allowed) identity of today is that of Russia / Eurasia. Because it protects the world from its major enemy “Anglo-Saxon” hegemony. When the major enemy is destroyed we are apparently going to have ideal many-polar world with no fundamental notion of what is civilized and what is not, what is good and what is evil, what is right and what is wrong, because major code of the world, i.e. Human Rights Bill, created by the Anglo-Saxon superpower is going to be annihilated after the complete fall of the first, rendering us completely value free.
Previous wars were those of races, the new war is going to be the war of values, for which White genocide is but an instrument.
This I will more discuss in 3d part of these series.
Sources:
https://tsargrad.tv/articles/aleksandr-dugin-chto-takoe-tradicionnyj-islam_42968
https://www.geopolitika.ru/article/intervyu-s-aleksandrom-duginym-o-shiitskom-islame-irane-i-proekte-noomahiya
https://islamnews.ru/dugin-zapret-na-khidzhaby-vo-frantsii-eto-borba-ne-tolko-s-islamom-no-i-s-khristianstvom
https://www.rusbg.com/11/mneniya-aleksandr-dugin-svobodnaya-evropa.html
https://libraryofthoth.org/English/JoS_Forums_Contributions/Dugin_Admits_He_Studies_the_Kabbalah_in_Hebrew_-_JoS_Forums_Contributions.pdf
https://www.sova-center.ru/hate-speech/news/2006/02/d7331/
Interview with Patriarch Kirill [rutube video]
Interview with Noel Ignatiev [bitchute video]
Dugin’s interview for Kommersant
Dugin’s interview for Tucker Carlson in English.
Dugin’s speech for RIA Novosti.
https://fitzinfo.net/aleksandr-dugin-dossier/
Populism and proxy wars
https://zavtra.ru/blogs/mir_tcivilizatcij
https://izborsk-club.ru/22121